Lodash makes JavaScript easier by taking the hassle out of working with arrays, numbers, objects, strings, etc. Phiên bản trước của lodash là underscore. Javascript Pure JavaScript Functions as a Replacement for Lodash Support loaders to preprocess files, i.e. "Cross-browser" is the primary reason why developers choose jQuery. This method is like _.difference except that it accepts comparator which is invoked to compare elements of array to values. It performs a deep comparison between two objects to determine whether they are equivalent. Lodash lodash typescript alternative - Chris Carragher Lodash isEqual test_ (version: 0) Test on isEqual performance Comparing performance of: _.isEqual Level 1 vs JSON.stringify Level 1 vs _.isEqual Level 2 vs JSON.stringify Level 2 vs _.isEqual Level 3 vs JSON.stringify Level 3 vs _.isEqual Level 4 vs JSON.stringify Level 4 vs _.isEqual Level 5 vs JSON.stringify Level 5 Created: 14 minutes ago by: Guest I think both filter and some methods are about the same speed, both has to execute a function for each iteration, however, 'some' method will stop iteration when its function returns true for the first time.filter method will iterate entire array. Granted, I'd like to rid our project clean of Lodash stuff as you do, but as soon as I saw _.isEqual() usage I knew it's not gonna be straightforward. If you're already using Lodash, isEqual is the best approach to comparing if two objects are deep equal. If you're okay with extra dependencies, or you already have one of the libraries in your codebase, you can remove duplicates from an array in place using LoDash (or Underscore). lodash map . Basic Usage. After importing, you can use the isEqual function in your code. Add a Grepper Answer . 5 Lodash Alternatives in Modern JavaScript. “lodash isequal” Code Answer’s. _.isEqual – Lodash Docs v4.17.11 jQuery, Underscore, Ramda, ES6, and RxJS are the most popular alternatives and competitors to Lodash. lodash is equal array order Code Example - codegrepper.com Folktale. uses lodash functions most of the time (thus checking for ownProperties and not just all enurables; a version without this can be achieved by swapping all _.has with _.hasIn, _.entries with _.entriesIn and etc) Issues: [] and {} are treated the same just like the original code.